""" @generated by mypy-protobuf. Do not edit manually! isort:skip_file Author: kenton@google.com (Kenton Varda) Based on original Protocol Buffers design by Sanjay Ghemawat, Jeff Dean, and others. The messages in this file describe the definitions found in .proto files. A valid .proto file can be translated directly to a FileDescriptorProto without any other information (e.g. without reading its imports). """ import builtins import collections.abc import sys import typing import google.protobuf.descriptor import google.protobuf.internal.containers import google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper import google.protobuf.message if sys.version_info >= (3, 10): import typing as typing_extensions else: import typing_extensions DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.FileDescriptor @typing_extensions.final class FileDescriptorSet(google.protobuf.message.Message): """The protocol compiler can output a FileDescriptorSet containing the .proto files it parses. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor FILE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def file(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___FileDescriptorProto]: ... def __init__( self, *, file: collections.abc.Iterable[global___FileDescriptorProto] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["file", b"file"]) -> None: ... global___FileDescriptorSet = FileDescriptorSet @typing_extensions.final class FileDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a complete .proto file.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PACKAGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEPENDENCY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PUBLIC_DEPENDENCY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int WEAK_DEPENDENCY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int MESSAGE_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int ENUM_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SERVICE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int EXTENSION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SOURCE_CODE_INFO_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SYNTAX_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str """file name, relative to root of source tree""" package: builtins.str """e.g. "foo", "foo.bar", etc.""" @property def dependency(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.str]: """Names of files imported by this file.""" @property def public_dependency(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.int]: """Indexes of the public imported files in the dependency list above.""" @property def weak_dependency(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.int]: """Indexes of the weak imported files in the dependency list. For Google-internal migration only. Do not use. """ @property def message_type(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___DescriptorProto]: """All top-level definitions in this file.""" @property def enum_type(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___EnumDescriptorProto]: ... @property def service(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___ServiceDescriptorProto]: ... @property def extension(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___FieldDescriptorProto]: ... @property def options(self) -> global___FileOptions: ... @property def source_code_info(self) -> global___SourceCodeInfo: """This field contains optional information about the original source code. You may safely remove this entire field without harming runtime functionality of the descriptors -- the information is needed only by development tools. """ syntax: builtins.str """The syntax of the proto file. The supported values are "proto2" and "proto3". """ def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., package: builtins.str | None = ..., dependency: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.str] | None = ..., public_dependency: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.int] | None = ..., weak_dependency: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.int] | None = ..., message_type: collections.abc.Iterable[global___DescriptorProto] | None = ..., enum_type: collections.abc.Iterable[global___EnumDescriptorProto] | None = ..., service: collections.abc.Iterable[global___ServiceDescriptorProto] | None = ..., extension: collections.abc.Iterable[global___FieldDescriptorProto] | None = ..., options: global___FileOptions | None = ..., source_code_info: global___SourceCodeInfo | None = ..., syntax: builtins.str | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options", "package", b"package", "source_code_info", b"source_code_info", "syntax", b"syntax"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["dependency", b"dependency", "enum_type", b"enum_type", "extension", b"extension", "message_type", b"message_type", "name", b"name", "options", b"options", "package", b"package", "public_dependency", b"public_dependency", "service", b"service", "source_code_info", b"source_code_info", "syntax", b"syntax", "weak_dependency", b"weak_dependency"]) -> None: ... global___FileDescriptorProto = FileDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class DescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a message type.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor @typing_extensions.final class ExtensionRange(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor START_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int END_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int start: builtins.int """Inclusive.""" end: builtins.int """Exclusive.""" @property def options(self) -> global___ExtensionRangeOptions: ... def __init__( self, *, start: builtins.int | None = ..., end: builtins.int | None = ..., options: global___ExtensionRangeOptions | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "options", b"options", "start", b"start"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "options", b"options", "start", b"start"]) -> None: ... @typing_extensions.final class ReservedRange(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Range of reserved tag numbers. Reserved tag numbers may not be used by fields or extension ranges in the same message. Reserved ranges may not overlap. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor START_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int END_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int start: builtins.int """Inclusive.""" end: builtins.int """Exclusive.""" def __init__( self, *, start: builtins.int | None = ..., end: builtins.int | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "start", b"start"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "start", b"start"]) -> None: ... NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int FIELD_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int EXTENSION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int NESTED_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int ENUM_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int EXTENSION_RANGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int ONEOF_DECL_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int RESERVED_RANGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int RESERVED_NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str @property def field(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___FieldDescriptorProto]: ... @property def extension(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___FieldDescriptorProto]: ... @property def nested_type(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___DescriptorProto]: ... @property def enum_type(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___EnumDescriptorProto]: ... @property def extension_range(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___DescriptorProto.ExtensionRange]: ... @property def oneof_decl(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___OneofDescriptorProto]: ... @property def options(self) -> global___MessageOptions: ... @property def reserved_range(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___DescriptorProto.ReservedRange]: ... @property def reserved_name(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.str]: """Reserved field names, which may not be used by fields in the same message. A given name may only be reserved once. """ def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., field: collections.abc.Iterable[global___FieldDescriptorProto] | None = ..., extension: collections.abc.Iterable[global___FieldDescriptorProto] | None = ..., nested_type: collections.abc.Iterable[global___DescriptorProto] | None = ..., enum_type: collections.abc.Iterable[global___EnumDescriptorProto] | None = ..., extension_range: collections.abc.Iterable[global___DescriptorProto.ExtensionRange] | None = ..., oneof_decl: collections.abc.Iterable[global___OneofDescriptorProto] | None = ..., options: global___MessageOptions | None = ..., reserved_range: collections.abc.Iterable[global___DescriptorProto.ReservedRange] | None = ..., reserved_name: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.str] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["enum_type", b"enum_type", "extension", b"extension", "extension_range", b"extension_range", "field", b"field", "name", b"name", "nested_type", b"nested_type", "oneof_decl", b"oneof_decl", "options", b"options", "reserved_name", b"reserved_name", "reserved_range", b"reserved_range"]) -> None: ... global___DescriptorProto = DescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class ExtensionRangeOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___ExtensionRangeOptions = ExtensionRangeOptions @typing_extensions.final class FieldDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a field within a message.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor class _Type: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _TypeEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor TYPE_DOUBLE: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 1 """0 is reserved for errors. Order is weird for historical reasons. """ TYPE_FLOAT: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 2 TYPE_INT64: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 3 """Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT64 if negative values are likely. """ TYPE_UINT64: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 4 TYPE_INT32: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 5 """Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT32 if negative values are likely. """ TYPE_FIXED64: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 6 TYPE_FIXED32: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 7 TYPE_BOOL: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 8 TYPE_STRING: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 9 TYPE_GROUP: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 10 """Tag-delimited aggregate. Group type is deprecated and not supported in proto3. However, Proto3 implementations should still be able to parse the group wire format and treat group fields as unknown fields. """ TYPE_MESSAGE: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 11 """Length-delimited aggregate.""" TYPE_BYTES: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 12 """New in version 2.""" TYPE_UINT32: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 13 TYPE_ENUM: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 14 TYPE_SFIXED32: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 15 TYPE_SFIXED64: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 16 TYPE_SINT32: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 17 """Uses ZigZag encoding.""" TYPE_SINT64: FieldDescriptorProto._Type.ValueType # 18 """Uses ZigZag encoding.""" class Type(_Type, metaclass=_TypeEnumTypeWrapper): ... TYPE_DOUBLE: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 1 """0 is reserved for errors. Order is weird for historical reasons. """ TYPE_FLOAT: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 2 TYPE_INT64: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 3 """Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT64 if negative values are likely. """ TYPE_UINT64: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 4 TYPE_INT32: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 5 """Not ZigZag encoded. Negative numbers take 10 bytes. Use TYPE_SINT32 if negative values are likely. """ TYPE_FIXED64: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 6 TYPE_FIXED32: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 7 TYPE_BOOL: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 8 TYPE_STRING: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 9 TYPE_GROUP: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 10 """Tag-delimited aggregate. Group type is deprecated and not supported in proto3. However, Proto3 implementations should still be able to parse the group wire format and treat group fields as unknown fields. """ TYPE_MESSAGE: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 11 """Length-delimited aggregate.""" TYPE_BYTES: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 12 """New in version 2.""" TYPE_UINT32: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 13 TYPE_ENUM: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 14 TYPE_SFIXED32: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 15 TYPE_SFIXED64: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 16 TYPE_SINT32: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 17 """Uses ZigZag encoding.""" TYPE_SINT64: FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType # 18 """Uses ZigZag encoding.""" class _Label: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _LabelEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[FieldDescriptorProto._Label.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor LABEL_OPTIONAL: FieldDescriptorProto._Label.ValueType # 1 """0 is reserved for errors""" LABEL_REQUIRED: FieldDescriptorProto._Label.ValueType # 2 LABEL_REPEATED: FieldDescriptorProto._Label.ValueType # 3 class Label(_Label, metaclass=_LabelEnumTypeWrapper): ... LABEL_OPTIONAL: FieldDescriptorProto.Label.ValueType # 1 """0 is reserved for errors""" LABEL_REQUIRED: FieldDescriptorProto.Label.ValueType # 2 LABEL_REPEATED: FieldDescriptorProto.Label.ValueType # 3 NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int NUMBER_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int LABEL_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int TYPE_NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int EXTENDEE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEFAULT_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int ONEOF_INDEX_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JSON_NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PROTO3_OPTIONAL_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str number: builtins.int label: global___FieldDescriptorProto.Label.ValueType type: global___FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType """If type_name is set, this need not be set. If both this and type_name are set, this must be one of TYPE_ENUM, TYPE_MESSAGE or TYPE_GROUP. """ type_name: builtins.str """For message and enum types, this is the name of the type. If the name starts with a '.', it is fully-qualified. Otherwise, C++-like scoping rules are used to find the type (i.e. first the nested types within this message are searched, then within the parent, on up to the root namespace). """ extendee: builtins.str """For extensions, this is the name of the type being extended. It is resolved in the same manner as type_name. """ default_value: builtins.str """For numeric types, contains the original text representation of the value. For booleans, "true" or "false". For strings, contains the default text contents (not escaped in any way). For bytes, contains the C escaped value. All bytes >= 128 are escaped. """ oneof_index: builtins.int """If set, gives the index of a oneof in the containing type's oneof_decl list. This field is a member of that oneof. """ json_name: builtins.str """JSON name of this field. The value is set by protocol compiler. If the user has set a "json_name" option on this field, that option's value will be used. Otherwise, it's deduced from the field's name by converting it to camelCase. """ @property def options(self) -> global___FieldOptions: ... proto3_optional: builtins.bool """If true, this is a proto3 "optional". When a proto3 field is optional, it tracks presence regardless of field type. When proto3_optional is true, this field must be belong to a oneof to signal to old proto3 clients that presence is tracked for this field. This oneof is known as a "synthetic" oneof, and this field must be its sole member (each proto3 optional field gets its own synthetic oneof). Synthetic oneofs exist in the descriptor only, and do not generate any API. Synthetic oneofs must be ordered after all "real" oneofs. For message fields, proto3_optional doesn't create any semantic change, since non-repeated message fields always track presence. However it still indicates the semantic detail of whether the user wrote "optional" or not. This can be useful for round-tripping the .proto file. For consistency we give message fields a synthetic oneof also, even though it is not required to track presence. This is especially important because the parser can't tell if a field is a message or an enum, so it must always create a synthetic oneof. Proto2 optional fields do not set this flag, because they already indicate optional with `LABEL_OPTIONAL`. """ def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., number: builtins.int | None = ..., label: global___FieldDescriptorProto.Label.ValueType | None = ..., type: global___FieldDescriptorProto.Type.ValueType | None = ..., type_name: builtins.str | None = ..., extendee: builtins.str | None = ..., default_value: builtins.str | None = ..., oneof_index: builtins.int | None = ..., json_name: builtins.str | None = ..., options: global___FieldOptions | None = ..., proto3_optional: builtins.bool | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["default_value", b"default_value", "extendee", b"extendee", "json_name", b"json_name", "label", b"label", "name", b"name", "number", b"number", "oneof_index", b"oneof_index", "options", b"options", "proto3_optional", b"proto3_optional", "type", b"type", "type_name", b"type_name"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["default_value", b"default_value", "extendee", b"extendee", "json_name", b"json_name", "label", b"label", "name", b"name", "number", b"number", "oneof_index", b"oneof_index", "options", b"options", "proto3_optional", b"proto3_optional", "type", b"type", "type_name", b"type_name"]) -> None: ... global___FieldDescriptorProto = FieldDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class OneofDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a oneof.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str @property def options(self) -> global___OneofOptions: ... def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., options: global___OneofOptions | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> None: ... global___OneofDescriptorProto = OneofDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class EnumDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes an enum type.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor @typing_extensions.final class EnumReservedRange(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Range of reserved numeric values. Reserved values may not be used by entries in the same enum. Reserved ranges may not overlap. Note that this is distinct from DescriptorProto.ReservedRange in that it is inclusive such that it can appropriately represent the entire int32 domain. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor START_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int END_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int start: builtins.int """Inclusive.""" end: builtins.int """Inclusive.""" def __init__( self, *, start: builtins.int | None = ..., end: builtins.int | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "start", b"start"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["end", b"end", "start", b"start"]) -> None: ... NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int RESERVED_RANGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int RESERVED_NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str @property def value(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___EnumValueDescriptorProto]: ... @property def options(self) -> global___EnumOptions: ... @property def reserved_range(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___EnumDescriptorProto.EnumReservedRange]: """Range of reserved numeric values. Reserved numeric values may not be used by enum values in the same enum declaration. Reserved ranges may not overlap. """ @property def reserved_name(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.str]: """Reserved enum value names, which may not be reused. A given name may only be reserved once. """ def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., value: collections.abc.Iterable[global___EnumValueDescriptorProto] | None = ..., options: global___EnumOptions | None = ..., reserved_range: collections.abc.Iterable[global___EnumDescriptorProto.EnumReservedRange] | None = ..., reserved_name: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.str] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options", "reserved_name", b"reserved_name", "reserved_range", b"reserved_range", "value", b"value"]) -> None: ... global___EnumDescriptorProto = EnumDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class EnumValueDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a value within an enum.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int NUMBER_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str number: builtins.int @property def options(self) -> global___EnumValueOptions: ... def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., number: builtins.int | None = ..., options: global___EnumValueOptions | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "number", b"number", "options", b"options"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "number", b"number", "options", b"options"]) -> None: ... global___EnumValueDescriptorProto = EnumValueDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class ServiceDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a service.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int METHOD_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str @property def method(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___MethodDescriptorProto]: ... @property def options(self) -> global___ServiceOptions: ... def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., method: collections.abc.Iterable[global___MethodDescriptorProto] | None = ..., options: global___ServiceOptions | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["method", b"method", "name", b"name", "options", b"options"]) -> None: ... global___ServiceDescriptorProto = ServiceDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class MethodDescriptorProto(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes a method of a service.""" DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int INPUT_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OUTPUT_TYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIONS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int CLIENT_STREAMING_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SERVER_STREAMING_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name: builtins.str input_type: builtins.str """Input and output type names. These are resolved in the same way as FieldDescriptorProto.type_name, but must refer to a message type. """ output_type: builtins.str @property def options(self) -> global___MethodOptions: ... client_streaming: builtins.bool """Identifies if client streams multiple client messages""" server_streaming: builtins.bool """Identifies if server streams multiple server messages""" def __init__( self, *, name: builtins.str | None = ..., input_type: builtins.str | None = ..., output_type: builtins.str | None = ..., options: global___MethodOptions | None = ..., client_streaming: builtins.bool | None = ..., server_streaming: builtins.bool | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["client_streaming", b"client_streaming", "input_type", b"input_type", "name", b"name", "options", b"options", "output_type", b"output_type", "server_streaming", b"server_streaming"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["client_streaming", b"client_streaming", "input_type", b"input_type", "name", b"name", "options", b"options", "output_type", b"output_type", "server_streaming", b"server_streaming"]) -> None: ... global___MethodDescriptorProto = MethodDescriptorProto @typing_extensions.final class FileOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Each of the definitions above may have "options" attached. These are just annotations which may cause code to be generated slightly differently or may contain hints for code that manipulates protocol messages. Clients may define custom options as extensions of the *Options messages. These extensions may not yet be known at parsing time, so the parser cannot store the values in them. Instead it stores them in a field in the *Options message called uninterpreted_option. This field must have the same name across all *Options messages. We then use this field to populate the extensions when we build a descriptor, at which point all protos have been parsed and so all extensions are known. Extension numbers for custom options may be chosen as follows: * For options which will only be used within a single application or organization, or for experimental options, use field numbers 50000 through 99999. It is up to you to ensure that you do not use the same number for multiple options. * For options which will be published and used publicly by multiple independent entities, e-mail protobuf-global-extension-registry@google.com to reserve extension numbers. Simply provide your project name (e.g. Objective-C plugin) and your project website (if available) -- there's no need to explain how you intend to use them. Usually you only need one extension number. You can declare multiple options with only one extension number by putting them in a sub-message. See the Custom Options section of the docs for examples: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto#options If this turns out to be popular, a web service will be set up to automatically assign option numbers. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor class _OptimizeMode: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _OptimizeModeEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[FileOptions._OptimizeMode.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor SPEED: FileOptions._OptimizeMode.ValueType # 1 """Generate complete code for parsing, serialization,""" CODE_SIZE: FileOptions._OptimizeMode.ValueType # 2 """etc. Use ReflectionOps to implement these methods. """ LITE_RUNTIME: FileOptions._OptimizeMode.ValueType # 3 """Generate code using MessageLite and the lite runtime.""" class OptimizeMode(_OptimizeMode, metaclass=_OptimizeModeEnumTypeWrapper): """Generated classes can be optimized for speed or code size.""" SPEED: FileOptions.OptimizeMode.ValueType # 1 """Generate complete code for parsing, serialization,""" CODE_SIZE: FileOptions.OptimizeMode.ValueType # 2 """etc. Use ReflectionOps to implement these methods. """ LITE_RUNTIME: FileOptions.OptimizeMode.ValueType # 3 """Generate code using MessageLite and the lite runtime.""" JAVA_PACKAGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JAVA_OUTER_CLASSNAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JAVA_MULTIPLE_FILES_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JAVA_GENERATE_EQUALS_AND_HASH_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JAVA_STRING_CHECK_UTF8_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OPTIMIZE_FOR_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int GO_PACKAGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int CC_GENERIC_SERVICES_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JAVA_GENERIC_SERVICES_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PY_GENERIC_SERVICES_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PHP_GENERIC_SERVICES_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int CC_ENABLE_ARENAS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int OBJC_CLASS_PREFIX_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int CSHARP_NAMESPACE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SWIFT_PREFIX_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PHP_CLASS_PREFIX_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PHP_NAMESPACE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PHP_METADATA_NAMESPACE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int RUBY_PACKAGE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int java_package: builtins.str """Sets the Java package where classes generated from this .proto will be placed. By default, the proto package is used, but this is often inappropriate because proto packages do not normally start with backwards domain names. """ java_outer_classname: builtins.str """Controls the name of the wrapper Java class generated for the .proto file. That class will always contain the .proto file's getDescriptor() method as well as any top-level extensions defined in the .proto file. If java_multiple_files is disabled, then all the other classes from the .proto file will be nested inside the single wrapper outer class. """ java_multiple_files: builtins.bool """If enabled, then the Java code generator will generate a separate .java file for each top-level message, enum, and service defined in the .proto file. Thus, these types will *not* be nested inside the wrapper class named by java_outer_classname. However, the wrapper class will still be generated to contain the file's getDescriptor() method as well as any top-level extensions defined in the file. """ java_generate_equals_and_hash: builtins.bool """This option does nothing.""" java_string_check_utf8: builtins.bool """If set true, then the Java2 code generator will generate code that throws an exception whenever an attempt is made to assign a non-UTF-8 byte sequence to a string field. Message reflection will do the same. However, an extension field still accepts non-UTF-8 byte sequences. This option has no effect on when used with the lite runtime. """ optimize_for: global___FileOptions.OptimizeMode.ValueType go_package: builtins.str """Sets the Go package where structs generated from this .proto will be placed. If omitted, the Go package will be derived from the following: - The basename of the package import path, if provided. - Otherwise, the package statement in the .proto file, if present. - Otherwise, the basename of the .proto file, without extension. """ cc_generic_services: builtins.bool """Should generic services be generated in each language? "Generic" services are not specific to any particular RPC system. They are generated by the main code generators in each language (without additional plugins). Generic services were the only kind of service generation supported by early versions of google.protobuf. Generic services are now considered deprecated in favor of using plugins that generate code specific to your particular RPC system. Therefore, these default to false. Old code which depends on generic services should explicitly set them to true. """ java_generic_services: builtins.bool py_generic_services: builtins.bool php_generic_services: builtins.bool deprecated: builtins.bool """Is this file deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for everything in the file, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating files. """ cc_enable_arenas: builtins.bool """Enables the use of arenas for the proto messages in this file. This applies only to generated classes for C++. """ objc_class_prefix: builtins.str """Sets the objective c class prefix which is prepended to all objective c generated classes from this .proto. There is no default. """ csharp_namespace: builtins.str """Namespace for generated classes; defaults to the package.""" swift_prefix: builtins.str """By default Swift generators will take the proto package and CamelCase it replacing '.' with underscore and use that to prefix the types/symbols defined. When this options is provided, they will use this value instead to prefix the types/symbols defined. """ php_class_prefix: builtins.str """Sets the php class prefix which is prepended to all php generated classes from this .proto. Default is empty. """ php_namespace: builtins.str """Use this option to change the namespace of php generated classes. Default is empty. When this option is empty, the package name will be used for determining the namespace. """ php_metadata_namespace: builtins.str """Use this option to change the namespace of php generated metadata classes. Default is empty. When this option is empty, the proto file name will be used for determining the namespace. """ ruby_package: builtins.str """Use this option to change the package of ruby generated classes. Default is empty. When this option is not set, the package name will be used for determining the ruby package. """ @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See the documentation for the "Options" section above. """ def __init__( self, *, java_package: builtins.str | None = ..., java_outer_classname: builtins.str | None = ..., java_multiple_files: builtins.bool | None = ..., java_generate_equals_and_hash: builtins.bool | None = ..., java_string_check_utf8: builtins.bool | None = ..., optimize_for: global___FileOptions.OptimizeMode.ValueType | None = ..., go_package: builtins.str | None = ..., cc_generic_services: builtins.bool | None = ..., java_generic_services: builtins.bool | None = ..., py_generic_services: builtins.bool | None = ..., php_generic_services: builtins.bool | None = ..., deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., cc_enable_arenas: builtins.bool | None = ..., objc_class_prefix: builtins.str | None = ..., csharp_namespace: builtins.str | None = ..., swift_prefix: builtins.str | None = ..., php_class_prefix: builtins.str | None = ..., php_namespace: builtins.str | None = ..., php_metadata_namespace: builtins.str | None = ..., ruby_package: builtins.str | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["cc_enable_arenas", b"cc_enable_arenas", "cc_generic_services", b"cc_generic_services", "csharp_namespace", b"csharp_namespace", "deprecated", b"deprecated", "go_package", b"go_package", "java_generate_equals_and_hash", b"java_generate_equals_and_hash", "java_generic_services", b"java_generic_services", "java_multiple_files", b"java_multiple_files", "java_outer_classname", b"java_outer_classname", "java_package", b"java_package", "java_string_check_utf8", b"java_string_check_utf8", "objc_class_prefix", b"objc_class_prefix", "optimize_for", b"optimize_for", "php_class_prefix", b"php_class_prefix", "php_generic_services", b"php_generic_services", "php_metadata_namespace", b"php_metadata_namespace", "php_namespace", b"php_namespace", "py_generic_services", b"py_generic_services", "ruby_package", b"ruby_package", "swift_prefix", b"swift_prefix"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["cc_enable_arenas", b"cc_enable_arenas", "cc_generic_services", b"cc_generic_services", "csharp_namespace", b"csharp_namespace", "deprecated", b"deprecated", "go_package", b"go_package", "java_generate_equals_and_hash", b"java_generate_equals_and_hash", "java_generic_services", b"java_generic_services", "java_multiple_files", b"java_multiple_files", "java_outer_classname", b"java_outer_classname", "java_package", b"java_package", "java_string_check_utf8", b"java_string_check_utf8", "objc_class_prefix", b"objc_class_prefix", "optimize_for", b"optimize_for", "php_class_prefix", b"php_class_prefix", "php_generic_services", b"php_generic_services", "php_metadata_namespace", b"php_metadata_namespace", "php_namespace", b"php_namespace", "py_generic_services", b"py_generic_services", "ruby_package", b"ruby_package", "swift_prefix", b"swift_prefix", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___FileOptions = FileOptions @typing_extensions.final class MessageOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor MESSAGE_SET_WIRE_FORMAT_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int NO_STANDARD_DESCRIPTOR_ACCESSOR_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int MAP_ENTRY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int message_set_wire_format: builtins.bool """Set true to use the old proto1 MessageSet wire format for extensions. This is provided for backwards-compatibility with the MessageSet wire format. You should not use this for any other reason: It's less efficient, has fewer features, and is more complicated. The message must be defined exactly as follows: message Foo { option message_set_wire_format = true; extensions 4 to max; } Note that the message cannot have any defined fields; MessageSets only have extensions. All extensions of your type must be singular messages; e.g. they cannot be int32s, enums, or repeated messages. Because this is an option, the above two restrictions are not enforced by the protocol compiler. """ no_standard_descriptor_accessor: builtins.bool """Disables the generation of the standard "descriptor()" accessor, which can conflict with a field of the same name. This is meant to make migration from proto1 easier; new code should avoid fields named "descriptor". """ deprecated: builtins.bool """Is this message deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for the message, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating messages. """ map_entry: builtins.bool """Whether the message is an automatically generated map entry type for the maps field. For maps fields: map map_field = 1; The parsed descriptor looks like: message MapFieldEntry { option map_entry = true; optional KeyType key = 1; optional ValueType value = 2; } repeated MapFieldEntry map_field = 1; Implementations may choose not to generate the map_entry=true message, but use a native map in the target language to hold the keys and values. The reflection APIs in such implementations still need to work as if the field is a repeated message field. NOTE: Do not set the option in .proto files. Always use the maps syntax instead. The option should only be implicitly set by the proto compiler parser. """ @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, message_set_wire_format: builtins.bool | None = ..., no_standard_descriptor_accessor: builtins.bool | None = ..., deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., map_entry: builtins.bool | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "map_entry", b"map_entry", "message_set_wire_format", b"message_set_wire_format", "no_standard_descriptor_accessor", b"no_standard_descriptor_accessor"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "map_entry", b"map_entry", "message_set_wire_format", b"message_set_wire_format", "no_standard_descriptor_accessor", b"no_standard_descriptor_accessor", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___MessageOptions = MessageOptions @typing_extensions.final class FieldOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor class _CType: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _CTypeEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[FieldOptions._CType.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor STRING: FieldOptions._CType.ValueType # 0 """Default mode.""" CORD: FieldOptions._CType.ValueType # 1 STRING_PIECE: FieldOptions._CType.ValueType # 2 class CType(_CType, metaclass=_CTypeEnumTypeWrapper): ... STRING: FieldOptions.CType.ValueType # 0 """Default mode.""" CORD: FieldOptions.CType.ValueType # 1 STRING_PIECE: FieldOptions.CType.ValueType # 2 class _JSType: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _JSTypeEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[FieldOptions._JSType.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor JS_NORMAL: FieldOptions._JSType.ValueType # 0 """Use the default type.""" JS_STRING: FieldOptions._JSType.ValueType # 1 """Use JavaScript strings.""" JS_NUMBER: FieldOptions._JSType.ValueType # 2 """Use JavaScript numbers.""" class JSType(_JSType, metaclass=_JSTypeEnumTypeWrapper): ... JS_NORMAL: FieldOptions.JSType.ValueType # 0 """Use the default type.""" JS_STRING: FieldOptions.JSType.ValueType # 1 """Use JavaScript strings.""" JS_NUMBER: FieldOptions.JSType.ValueType # 2 """Use JavaScript numbers.""" CTYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int PACKED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int JSTYPE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int LAZY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNVERIFIED_LAZY_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int WEAK_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int ctype: global___FieldOptions.CType.ValueType """The ctype option instructs the C++ code generator to use a different representation of the field than it normally would. See the specific options below. This option is not yet implemented in the open source release -- sorry, we'll try to include it in a future version! """ packed: builtins.bool """The packed option can be enabled for repeated primitive fields to enable a more efficient representation on the wire. Rather than repeatedly writing the tag and type for each element, the entire array is encoded as a single length-delimited blob. In proto3, only explicit setting it to false will avoid using packed encoding. """ jstype: global___FieldOptions.JSType.ValueType """The jstype option determines the JavaScript type used for values of the field. The option is permitted only for 64 bit integral and fixed types (int64, uint64, sint64, fixed64, sfixed64). A field with jstype JS_STRING is represented as JavaScript string, which avoids loss of precision that can happen when a large value is converted to a floating point JavaScript. Specifying JS_NUMBER for the jstype causes the generated JavaScript code to use the JavaScript "number" type. The behavior of the default option JS_NORMAL is implementation dependent. This option is an enum to permit additional types to be added, e.g. goog.math.Integer. """ lazy: builtins.bool """Should this field be parsed lazily? Lazy applies only to message-type fields. It means that when the outer message is initially parsed, the inner message's contents will not be parsed but instead stored in encoded form. The inner message will actually be parsed when it is first accessed. This is only a hint. Implementations are free to choose whether to use eager or lazy parsing regardless of the value of this option. However, setting this option true suggests that the protocol author believes that using lazy parsing on this field is worth the additional bookkeeping overhead typically needed to implement it. This option does not affect the public interface of any generated code; all method signatures remain the same. Furthermore, thread-safety of the interface is not affected by this option; const methods remain safe to call from multiple threads concurrently, while non-const methods continue to require exclusive access. Note that implementations may choose not to check required fields within a lazy sub-message. That is, calling IsInitialized() on the outer message may return true even if the inner message has missing required fields. This is necessary because otherwise the inner message would have to be parsed in order to perform the check, defeating the purpose of lazy parsing. An implementation which chooses not to check required fields must be consistent about it. That is, for any particular sub-message, the implementation must either *always* check its required fields, or *never* check its required fields, regardless of whether or not the message has been parsed. As of 2021, lazy does no correctness checks on the byte stream during parsing. This may lead to crashes if and when an invalid byte stream is finally parsed upon access. TODO(b/211906113): Enable validation on lazy fields. """ unverified_lazy: builtins.bool """unverified_lazy does no correctness checks on the byte stream. This should only be used where lazy with verification is prohibitive for performance reasons. """ deprecated: builtins.bool """Is this field deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for accessors, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating fields. """ weak: builtins.bool """For Google-internal migration only. Do not use.""" @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, ctype: global___FieldOptions.CType.ValueType | None = ..., packed: builtins.bool | None = ..., jstype: global___FieldOptions.JSType.ValueType | None = ..., lazy: builtins.bool | None = ..., unverified_lazy: builtins.bool | None = ..., deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., weak: builtins.bool | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["ctype", b"ctype", "deprecated", b"deprecated", "jstype", b"jstype", "lazy", b"lazy", "packed", b"packed", "unverified_lazy", b"unverified_lazy", "weak", b"weak"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["ctype", b"ctype", "deprecated", b"deprecated", "jstype", b"jstype", "lazy", b"lazy", "packed", b"packed", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option", "unverified_lazy", b"unverified_lazy", "weak", b"weak"]) -> None: ... global___FieldOptions = FieldOptions @typing_extensions.final class OneofOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___OneofOptions = OneofOptions @typing_extensions.final class EnumOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor ALLOW_ALIAS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int allow_alias: builtins.bool """Set this option to true to allow mapping different tag names to the same value. """ deprecated: builtins.bool """Is this enum deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for the enum, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating enums. """ @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, allow_alias: builtins.bool | None = ..., deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["allow_alias", b"allow_alias", "deprecated", b"deprecated"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["allow_alias", b"allow_alias", "deprecated", b"deprecated", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___EnumOptions = EnumOptions @typing_extensions.final class EnumValueOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int deprecated: builtins.bool """Is this enum value deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for the enum value, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating enum values. """ @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___EnumValueOptions = EnumValueOptions @typing_extensions.final class ServiceOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int deprecated: builtins.bool """Note: Field numbers 1 through 32 are reserved for Google's internal RPC framework. We apologize for hoarding these numbers to ourselves, but we were already using them long before we decided to release Protocol Buffers. Is this service deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for the service, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating services. """ @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___ServiceOptions = ServiceOptions @typing_extensions.final class MethodOptions(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor class _IdempotencyLevel: ValueType = typing.NewType("ValueType", builtins.int) V: typing_extensions.TypeAlias = ValueType class _IdempotencyLevelEnumTypeWrapper(google.protobuf.internal.enum_type_wrapper._EnumTypeWrapper[MethodOptions._IdempotencyLevel.ValueType], builtins.type): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.EnumDescriptor IDEMPOTENCY_UNKNOWN: MethodOptions._IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 0 NO_SIDE_EFFECTS: MethodOptions._IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 1 """implies idempotent""" IDEMPOTENT: MethodOptions._IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 2 """idempotent, but may have side effects""" class IdempotencyLevel(_IdempotencyLevel, metaclass=_IdempotencyLevelEnumTypeWrapper): """Is this method side-effect-free (or safe in HTTP parlance), or idempotent, or neither? HTTP based RPC implementation may choose GET verb for safe methods, and PUT verb for idempotent methods instead of the default POST. """ IDEMPOTENCY_UNKNOWN: MethodOptions.IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 0 NO_SIDE_EFFECTS: MethodOptions.IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 1 """implies idempotent""" IDEMPOTENT: MethodOptions.IdempotencyLevel.ValueType # 2 """idempotent, but may have side effects""" DEPRECATED_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int IDEMPOTENCY_LEVEL_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int UNINTERPRETED_OPTION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int deprecated: builtins.bool """Note: Field numbers 1 through 32 are reserved for Google's internal RPC framework. We apologize for hoarding these numbers to ourselves, but we were already using them long before we decided to release Protocol Buffers. Is this method deprecated? Depending on the target platform, this can emit Deprecated annotations for the method, or it will be completely ignored; in the very least, this is a formalization for deprecating methods. """ idempotency_level: global___MethodOptions.IdempotencyLevel.ValueType @property def uninterpreted_option(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption]: """The parser stores options it doesn't recognize here. See above.""" def __init__( self, *, deprecated: builtins.bool | None = ..., idempotency_level: global___MethodOptions.IdempotencyLevel.ValueType | None = ..., uninterpreted_option: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "idempotency_level", b"idempotency_level"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["deprecated", b"deprecated", "idempotency_level", b"idempotency_level", "uninterpreted_option", b"uninterpreted_option"]) -> None: ... global___MethodOptions = MethodOptions @typing_extensions.final class UninterpretedOption(google.protobuf.message.Message): """A message representing a option the parser does not recognize. This only appears in options protos created by the compiler::Parser class. DescriptorPool resolves these when building Descriptor objects. Therefore, options protos in descriptor objects (e.g. returned by Descriptor::options(), or produced by Descriptor::CopyTo()) will never have UninterpretedOptions in them. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor @typing_extensions.final class NamePart(google.protobuf.message.Message): """The name of the uninterpreted option. Each string represents a segment in a dot-separated name. is_extension is true iff a segment represents an extension (denoted with parentheses in options specs in .proto files). E.g.,{ ["foo", false], ["bar.baz", true], ["moo", false] } represents "foo.(bar.baz).moo". """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor NAME_PART_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int IS_EXTENSION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int name_part: builtins.str is_extension: builtins.bool def __init__( self, *, name_part: builtins.str | None = ..., is_extension: builtins.bool | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["is_extension", b"is_extension", "name_part", b"name_part"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["is_extension", b"is_extension", "name_part", b"name_part"]) -> None: ... NAME_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int IDENTIFIER_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int POSITIVE_INT_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int NEGATIVE_INT_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int DOUBLE_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int STRING_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int AGGREGATE_VALUE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def name(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___UninterpretedOption.NamePart]: ... identifier_value: builtins.str """The value of the uninterpreted option, in whatever type the tokenizer identified it as during parsing. Exactly one of these should be set. """ positive_int_value: builtins.int negative_int_value: builtins.int double_value: builtins.float string_value: builtins.bytes aggregate_value: builtins.str def __init__( self, *, name: collections.abc.Iterable[global___UninterpretedOption.NamePart] | None = ..., identifier_value: builtins.str | None = ..., positive_int_value: builtins.int | None = ..., negative_int_value: builtins.int | None = ..., double_value: builtins.float | None = ..., string_value: builtins.bytes | None = ..., aggregate_value: builtins.str | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["aggregate_value", b"aggregate_value", "double_value", b"double_value", "identifier_value", b"identifier_value", "negative_int_value", b"negative_int_value", "positive_int_value", b"positive_int_value", "string_value", b"string_value"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["aggregate_value", b"aggregate_value", "double_value", b"double_value", "identifier_value", b"identifier_value", "name", b"name", "negative_int_value", b"negative_int_value", "positive_int_value", b"positive_int_value", "string_value", b"string_value"]) -> None: ... global___UninterpretedOption = UninterpretedOption @typing_extensions.final class SourceCodeInfo(google.protobuf.message.Message): """=================================================================== Optional source code info Encapsulates information about the original source file from which a FileDescriptorProto was generated. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor @typing_extensions.final class Location(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor PATH_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SPAN_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int LEADING_COMMENTS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int TRAILING_COMMENTS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int LEADING_DETACHED_COMMENTS_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def path(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.int]: """Identifies which part of the FileDescriptorProto was defined at this location. Each element is a field number or an index. They form a path from the root FileDescriptorProto to the place where the definition occurs. For example, this path: [ 4, 3, 2, 7, 1 ] refers to: file.message_type(3) // 4, 3 .field(7) // 2, 7 .name() // 1 This is because FileDescriptorProto.message_type has field number 4: repeated DescriptorProto message_type = 4; and DescriptorProto.field has field number 2: repeated FieldDescriptorProto field = 2; and FieldDescriptorProto.name has field number 1: optional string name = 1; Thus, the above path gives the location of a field name. If we removed the last element: [ 4, 3, 2, 7 ] this path refers to the whole field declaration (from the beginning of the label to the terminating semicolon). """ @property def span(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.int]: """Always has exactly three or four elements: start line, start column, end line (optional, otherwise assumed same as start line), end column. These are packed into a single field for efficiency. Note that line and column numbers are zero-based -- typically you will want to add 1 to each before displaying to a user. """ leading_comments: builtins.str """If this SourceCodeInfo represents a complete declaration, these are any comments appearing before and after the declaration which appear to be attached to the declaration. A series of line comments appearing on consecutive lines, with no other tokens appearing on those lines, will be treated as a single comment. leading_detached_comments will keep paragraphs of comments that appear before (but not connected to) the current element. Each paragraph, separated by empty lines, will be one comment element in the repeated field. Only the comment content is provided; comment markers (e.g. //) are stripped out. For block comments, leading whitespace and an asterisk will be stripped from the beginning of each line other than the first. Newlines are included in the output. Examples: optional int32 foo = 1; // Comment attached to foo. // Comment attached to bar. optional int32 bar = 2; optional string baz = 3; // Comment attached to baz. // Another line attached to baz. // Comment attached to moo. // // Another line attached to moo. optional double moo = 4; // Detached comment for corge. This is not leading or trailing comments // to moo or corge because there are blank lines separating it from // both. // Detached comment for corge paragraph 2. optional string corge = 5; /* Block comment attached * to corge. Leading asterisks * will be removed. */ /* Block comment attached to * grault. */ optional int32 grault = 6; // ignored detached comments. """ trailing_comments: builtins.str @property def leading_detached_comments(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.str]: ... def __init__( self, *, path: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.int] | None = ..., span: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.int] | None = ..., leading_comments: builtins.str | None = ..., trailing_comments: builtins.str | None = ..., leading_detached_comments: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.str] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["leading_comments", b"leading_comments", "trailing_comments", b"trailing_comments"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["leading_comments", b"leading_comments", "leading_detached_comments", b"leading_detached_comments", "path", b"path", "span", b"span", "trailing_comments", b"trailing_comments"]) -> None: ... LOCATION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def location(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___SourceCodeInfo.Location]: """A Location identifies a piece of source code in a .proto file which corresponds to a particular definition. This information is intended to be useful to IDEs, code indexers, documentation generators, and similar tools. For example, say we have a file like: message Foo { optional string foo = 1; } Let's look at just the field definition: optional string foo = 1; ^ ^^ ^^ ^ ^^^ a bc de f ghi We have the following locations: span path represents [a,i) [ 4, 0, 2, 0 ] The whole field definition. [a,b) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 4 ] The label (optional). [c,d) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 5 ] The type (string). [e,f) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 1 ] The name (foo). [g,h) [ 4, 0, 2, 0, 3 ] The number (1). Notes: - A location may refer to a repeated field itself (i.e. not to any particular index within it). This is used whenever a set of elements are logically enclosed in a single code segment. For example, an entire extend block (possibly containing multiple extension definitions) will have an outer location whose path refers to the "extensions" repeated field without an index. - Multiple locations may have the same path. This happens when a single logical declaration is spread out across multiple places. The most obvious example is the "extend" block again -- there may be multiple extend blocks in the same scope, each of which will have the same path. - A location's span is not always a subset of its parent's span. For example, the "extendee" of an extension declaration appears at the beginning of the "extend" block and is shared by all extensions within the block. - Just because a location's span is a subset of some other location's span does not mean that it is a descendant. For example, a "group" defines both a type and a field in a single declaration. Thus, the locations corresponding to the type and field and their components will overlap. - Code which tries to interpret locations should probably be designed to ignore those that it doesn't understand, as more types of locations could be recorded in the future. """ def __init__( self, *, location: collections.abc.Iterable[global___SourceCodeInfo.Location] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["location", b"location"]) -> None: ... global___SourceCodeInfo = SourceCodeInfo @typing_extensions.final class GeneratedCodeInfo(google.protobuf.message.Message): """Describes the relationship between generated code and its original source file. A GeneratedCodeInfo message is associated with only one generated source file, but may contain references to different source .proto files. """ DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor @typing_extensions.final class Annotation(google.protobuf.message.Message): DESCRIPTOR: google.protobuf.descriptor.Descriptor PATH_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int SOURCE_FILE_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int BEGIN_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int END_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def path(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedScalarFieldContainer[builtins.int]: """Identifies the element in the original source .proto file. This field is formatted the same as SourceCodeInfo.Location.path. """ source_file: builtins.str """Identifies the filesystem path to the original source .proto.""" begin: builtins.int """Identifies the starting offset in bytes in the generated code that relates to the identified object. """ end: builtins.int """Identifies the ending offset in bytes in the generated code that relates to the identified offset. The end offset should be one past the last relevant byte (so the length of the text = end - begin). """ def __init__( self, *, path: collections.abc.Iterable[builtins.int] | None = ..., source_file: builtins.str | None = ..., begin: builtins.int | None = ..., end: builtins.int | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def HasField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["begin", b"begin", "end", b"end", "source_file", b"source_file"]) -> builtins.bool: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["begin", b"begin", "end", b"end", "path", b"path", "source_file", b"source_file"]) -> None: ... ANNOTATION_FIELD_NUMBER: builtins.int @property def annotation(self) -> google.protobuf.internal.containers.RepeatedCompositeFieldContainer[global___GeneratedCodeInfo.Annotation]: """An Annotation connects some span of text in generated code to an element of its generating .proto file. """ def __init__( self, *, annotation: collections.abc.Iterable[global___GeneratedCodeInfo.Annotation] | None = ..., ) -> None: ... def ClearField(self, field_name: typing_extensions.Literal["annotation", b"annotation"]) -> None: ... global___GeneratedCodeInfo = GeneratedCodeInfo